Is Japan"s annexation of Korea in 1910 legal under international law?
The annexation of Korea by Japan in 1910 is a complex and controversial issue, and opinions on its legality under international law vary.
Some argue that the annexation was a clear violation of international law, as it involved the use of military force by one sovereign state to absorb the territory of another sovereign state without the latter"s consent. This argument is based on the principles of the contemporary international legal system, which recognizes the principle of state sovereignty and the inviolability of territorial borders.
Others, however, argue that the annexation was a legal and valid act under the international legal system of the time. They point to the lack of a clear and widely recognized framework for the protection of state sovereignty and the right of self-determination at the time of the annexation. In addition, they argue that the international community, including the major powers, failed to effectively intervene and stop the annexation, suggesting that the act was considered acceptable under the prevailing norms of international relations at the time.
In any case, the annexation of Korea by Japan is widely regarded as a traumatic event in Korean history, and its legacy continues to shape the political, economic, and cultural relationships between Korea and Japan to this day.
韓国人がchatGPTに答えを求めると、両論併記にならないようですね。
もしかして、ユーザーに応じて回答を調整してくれるのかもね！
Is Japan"s annexation of Korea in 1910 legal under international law?
The annexation of Korea by Japan in 1910 is a complex and controversial issue, and opinions on its legality under international law vary.
Some argue that the annexation was a clear violation of international law, as it involved the use of military force by one sovereign state to absorb the territory of another sovereign state without the latter"s consent. This argument is based on the principles of the contemporary international legal system, which recognizes the principle of state sovereignty and the inviolability of territorial borders.
Others, however, argue that the annexation was a legal and valid act under the international legal system of the time. They point to the lack of a clear and widely recognized framework for the protection of state sovereignty and the right of self-determination at the time of the annexation. In addition, they argue that the international community, including the major powers, failed to effectively intervene and stop the annexation, suggesting that the act was considered acceptable under the prevailing norms of international relations at the time.
In any case, the annexation of Korea by Japan is widely regarded as a traumatic event in Korean history, and its legacy continues to shape the political, economic, and cultural relationships between Korea and Japan to this day.
한국인이 chatGPT에 대답을 요구하면, 양론 병기가 되지 않는 것 같네요.
혹시, 유저에게 따라 회답을 조정해 주는지도!